Write an analysis on Ode to a Nightingale, focus Essay Example For Students

Write an analysis on Ode to a Nightingale, focus Essay ing on how Keats presentssome of the ideas he was struggling with at the time. A major point in Ode to a Nightingale is Keatss perception of theconflicted nature of human life, i.e., the interconnection or mixture ofpain/joy, life/death, mortal/immortal, the actual/the ideal, and theinextricable link between the real and the unreal. In the ode, Keatsfocuses on immediate sensations and emotions that the reader can draw aconclusion from or a notion. Throughout the ode he is trying to workthrough his ideas and feelings about pleasure and pain, and the linkbetween the real and the unreal. The opening of the poem is very heavy and negative; my heartaches, with numbness pains my sense making the reader think that it mustbe a very heavy pain to be felt when a person is numb. He feels as if hemight have of hemlock drunk or emptied some dull opiate to the drains;this resembles the qualities of the Lethe, the Underworld river that thedead drank from in order to forget all that they had done or said whileliving. The feeling is in fact the result of a deep awareness of thehappiness of the nightingale he hears singing; his resulting pleasure is sointense it has become painful. He feels joy and pain, a response of twominds he is happy, but he is too happy, which is then what is causing himthe pain. The ode reads as if Keats is jealous, but he is not, he isexamining the ironic link between happiness and sorrow; can pleasure be sointense that it numbs us or causes us pain? At the beginning of the ode,the bird is presented to us as a real bird, but as the poem progresses, thebird becomes a symbol for the beauties of nature and the ideal world. In the opening of the poem, a sense of sluggish weightiness issuggested by the heavy, almost thudding, alliterative sounds produced bythe repetition of d (drowsy, drunk, dull, drains), m (My,numb, hemlock, minute), and p (pains, emptied, opiate,past). If we compare this to the effects created in the second half ofthe stanza by the light assonantal trees, beechen green andsibilant sounds shadows, singest, summer the reader can see thatthe nightingale, in comparison to the poet, is a much freer spirit. Wanting to escape from the pain of a joy-pain reality, Keats beginsto move into a world of imagination or fantasy. He then says he wants to beintoxicated, clearly not wanting to get drunk, but he is associating thewine with a quality, or a state of mind which he is seeking. He wishes todrink to escape the real world, to leave the world unseen and enter theideal world through fantasy; he wants to be full of warmth and beauty; hewants to be free like the nightingale. He wishes to forget the negativity,aging, and the suffering of the world. Youth grows pale; could be seen ashim referring to his brother dying of tuberculosis a few years earlier, andbeauty cannot keep meaning everything beautiful dies. He personifiesbeauty here, with her lustrous eyes making beauty human, and so it willfade and die as all humans do eventually. The description of drinking andof the world associated with wine is idealized. The word vintage refersto a fine or prime wine; and it is used because if he was drin king a cheapwine, it would not have as pleasant an effect on him. Positive imagery isused much more as the feeling in the second stanza becomes a lot lighter,happier and freer. The activities in line 4 follow one another naturally:like a dance, and dance is associated with song; together they producepleasure (mirth), which is sunburnt because the country dances are heldoutdoors. Keats repeatedly combines different senses in one image; heattributes the traits of one sense to another, a practice calledsynaesthesia. Sunburnt mirth is an excellent example of synaesthesia inKeats imagery, since Flora, the green countryside, etc. are beingexperienced by Keats through drinking wine in his imagination. .ua3c3158c85f52f2a775f030a78677d37 , .ua3c3158c85f52f2a775f030a78677d37 .postImageUrl , .ua3c3158c85f52f2a775f030a78677d37 .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .ua3c3158c85f52f2a775f030a78677d37 , .ua3c3158c85f52f2a775f030a78677d37:hover , .ua3c3158c85f52f2a775f030a78677d37:visited , .ua3c3158c85f52f2a775f030a78677d37:active { border:0!important; } .ua3c3158c85f52f2a775f030a78677d37 .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .ua3c3158c85f52f2a775f030a78677d37 { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .ua3c3158c85f52f2a775f030a78677d37:active , .ua3c3158c85f52f2a775f030a78677d37:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .ua3c3158c85f52f2a775f030a78677d37 .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .ua3c3158c85f52f2a775f030a78677d37 .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .ua3c3158c85f52f2a775f030a78677d37 .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .ua3c3158c85f52f2a775f030a78677d37 .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .ua3c3158c85f52f2a775f030a78677d37:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .ua3c3158c85f52f2a775f030a78677d37 .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .ua3c3158c85f52f2a775f030a78677d37 .ua3c3158c85f52f2a775f030a78677d37-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .ua3c3158c85f52f2a775f030a78677d37:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: A Modest Proposal Response PaperThe image of the beaded bubbles winking at the brim is much admiredfor its onomatopoeic effect; it captures the action of sparkling wine andthe alliteration duplicates the sound of bubbles bursting. This image ofthe bubbles is actual; in contrast, the previous imagery in the stanza isabstract. His awareness of the real world pulls him back from the imaginedworld of drunken joy. He still perceives the real world as a world of joyand pain (the two being linked). Keats thinking of the human circumstanceintensifies Keats desire to escape the real world. Keats uses the wordfade in the last line of the second stanza and in the first line of thethi rd stanza to tie the stanzas together and to then be able to move easilyinto his next thought. By implication, the nightingale lives in a worldmuch different to Keats own; the nightingales world is full of beauty andtherefore will last forever, whilst Keats own world will not, it will oneday die and fade away. AKeats suddenly cries out Away! away! for I will fly to thee. He thenturns to fantasy again; he rejects the idea of drinking wine in line 2, andin line 3 he announces he is going to use the viewless wings of Poesy tojoin the nightingale. He explains that it might be difficult to get there,but in fact he is already there with the nightingale in the fantasy worldin his mind. He contrasts the experience through poetry to the dull brainthat perplexes and retards (line 4); the mind is often related to work,while the heart is usually related to emotion. In line 5, he seems tosucceed in joining the nightingale. The imagined world described in therest of the stanza is dark; there is no light, associating the light andthe dark to Platos Cave; the theory of the harsh light being the realworld, and the soft darkness is the ideal world. ABecause Keats cannot seein the darkness, he relies on his other senses, taking us through them inthe next stanza. Not being able to see makes the experience more intense,and the language intensifies with it, and the tone of the poem changes. Even in the dark refuge, death is present; embalmed meaning both amethod of burial and a sweet smell. Even in the ideal world there are stillnegative points. The hints of death bring the tone of the ode down again,to prepare us for his coming out of his trance in the last stanza. Itcould be said that death was almost anticipated (in a sort of propheticirony) by the vague suggestions in the words Lethe, hemlock, drowsynumbness, poisonous, and shadowy darknessIn the sixth stanza, Keats starts to distance himself from thenightingale, which he joined in imagination in the earlier parts of theode. Keats says he yearns to die, a state which he imagines as only joyful,as pain-free, and a state in which he can truly merge with the birds song. The nightingale is set apart as wholly blissfulfull-throated ease inthe first stanza and pouring forth thy soul abroad / In such an ecstasy!(lines 7-8). In the last two lines of this stanza, the poet no longeridentifies with the bird. He realizes what death means for him; death isnot release from pain; rather it means non-existence, the inability to feelthe birds ecstasy. Keats realizes that it is the song that will last, notthe bird, because if the nightingale were to fly away, the song would leavewith it. .ud98aa9067b8a8d2653643d539a1b1eea , .ud98aa9067b8a8d2653643d539a1b1eea .postImageUrl , .ud98aa9067b8a8d2653643d539a1b1eea .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .ud98aa9067b8a8d2653643d539a1b1eea , .ud98aa9067b8a8d2653643d539a1b1eea:hover , .ud98aa9067b8a8d2653643d539a1b1eea:visited , .ud98aa9067b8a8d2653643d539a1b1eea:active { border:0!important; } .ud98aa9067b8a8d2653643d539a1b1eea .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .ud98aa9067b8a8d2653643d539a1b1eea { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .ud98aa9067b8a8d2653643d539a1b1eea:active , .ud98aa9067b8a8d2653643d539a1b1eea:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .ud98aa9067b8a8d2653643d539a1b1eea .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .ud98aa9067b8a8d2653643d539a1b1eea .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .ud98aa9067b8a8d2653643d539a1b1eea .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .ud98aa9067b8a8d2653643d539a1b1eea .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .ud98aa9067b8a8d2653643d539a1b1eea:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .ud98aa9067b8a8d2653643d539a1b1eea .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .ud98aa9067b8a8d2653643d539a1b1eea .ud98aa9067b8a8d2653643d539a1b1eea-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .ud98aa9067b8a8d2653643d539a1b1eea:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: Drug Legalization In America EssayKeats moves from his awareness of his own mortality in the precedingstanza to the perception of the birds immortality. On a literal level, hisperception is wrong; this bird will die. On another level, he is suggestingthat the nightingale is a symbol of the continuity of nature. AForlorn and perilous would not ordinarily be associated withmagic/enchantment. These words hint at the pain the poet recognized in thebeginning of the poem and that which he is trying to escape. The poet repeats the word forlorn from the end of the seventhstanza; Keats is now forlorn, as thinking of the world has brought him backinto the real world. He describes the word forlorn as a bell, and each wordfrom the very to sole self has one syllable, and when read sounds verymuch like the tolling of a bell. In lines 2 and 3 or this stanza, the poetsays that fancy (his imagination) has cheated him, as has the elf (thenightingale). The bird has ceased to be a symbol and is again the actualbird the poet heard in the first stanza. Keats, like the nightingale, hasreturned to the real world. The birds song becomes a plaintive anthemand gets fainter as it flies away, which is Keats examining the idea ofpermanence through art, and art being beauty. If the bird flies away, thesong will leave too. The song dying is the last of the death imagesrunning through the poem. With the last two lines of the ode, Keats wonders whether he has hada true experience or whether he has been daydreaming. He is bothquestioning the validity of the experience, and expressing his inability tomaintain a true vision for a long time. This is another time where heexamines the permanence of things in art and the imagination. Is hisexperience a false vision, or is it a true experience of insight into thenature of reality?

Poetry Comparison Barbie Doll & Youths Progress Essays - Barbie Doll

Poetry Comparison Barbie Doll & Youth's Progress Young versus old. Death versus eternal life. The positive effects of societys pressure versus the negative. Marge Piercys Barbie Doll and Dick Schneiders Youths Progress are a study in the themes mentioned above. There are many obvious similarities in the chronological structure and irony of the two works. However, the reader will find that there are more thought-provoking contrasts than initially meet the eye. Not surprisingly, the poems follow the natural course of chronological time: beginning to end, young to old. Both poems unfold with birth, continue through the growing up years, but do not surpass adulthood. The separation of stanzas in both works indicates a new stage of life, though Piercy leaves the reader to guess the actual age of the girlchild in Barbie Doll. The reader will note that a major theme of both poems is the long-term effect of outside pressure on the subjects from birth. Piercy employs the stylistic device of irony throughout the entirety of her poem. It required the magic of puberty for a child to point out the negative aspects of a physical body. A healthy, intelligent and strong woman is compelled by society to bustle to and fro apologizing, apologizing for failing to mirror the image of the Barbie-like woman the world seems to want. Though she attempts to defy these expectations by cutting off her great big nose and fat legs, in her death the woman is displayed in her casket, cosmetics painted on and a beautiful turned-up putty nose. Finally, she fits the mold cut for her by society. Our way of life has hardly changed since a wheel first whetted a knife. While Youths Progress chronicles the growth of the subject with specific years and ages, Barbie Doll simply accounts for the passing of time in a story-tellers fashion of memories. Barbie Doll ends with the tragedy of a woman who, because she didnt live up to the unrealistic standard created for her, resorts to suicide. Youths Progress concludes with the exhortation of public approval and the sense of eternal life in exchange for submitting to the unofficial rules of social acceptance, eager to fit the mold. To some, the immortalized life of Schneider is preferable to the tragic death of Piercys girlchild Young versus old. Death versus eternal life. The positive effects of societys pressure versus the negative. The course a life will take is ultimately decided by the individual, the sum of his choices and reactions to the cards dealt to him by Life. The choice is yours. Bibliography Bowland, Eavan. Its a Womans World, 1982. Poetry and Poets

Biography of John F. Kennedy Jr.

Biography of John F. Kennedy Jr. John F. Kennedy Jr. (November 25, 1960–July 16, 1999), the son of President John F. Kennedy, was considered the heir to one of Americas greatest political dynasties until his death in a plane crash at age 38. In one of the most iconic photographs in American history, the 3-year-old Kennedy is seen saluting his fathers casket three days after the assassination of John F. Kennedy. Fast Facts: John F. Kennedy, Jr. Known For: Attorney, journalist, and son of President John F. KennedyBorn: Nov. 25, 1960 in Washington, D.C.Died: July 16, 1999 off the coast of Marthas Vineyard, MassachusettsEducation: Brown University, B.A.; New York University, J.D.Spouse: Carolyn BessetteKey Accomplishments: Criminal prosecutor in New York City, founder and publisher of George magazine, and founder of non-profit Reaching UpFamous Quote: â€Å"People often tell me I could be a great man. Id rather be a good man.† Childhood John F. Kennedy Jr. was born on November 25, 1960- the same month his father, John F. Kennedy, was elected to his first term as president. He became an instant celebrity, despite his parents attempts to give him as normal an upbringing as possible. Despite spending his first few years of life in the White House, however, Kennedy later said that he had lived a pretty normal life. Kennedy was the second of three children born to the Kennedys. His older sister was Caroline Bouvier Kennedy; his younger brother, Patrick, died in 1963, two days after birth. On his third birthday, in 1963, JFK Jr. became the subject of one of the most iconic scenes in American history: standing on a Washington street, wearing a dress coat, saluting his fathers flag-draped coffin as it passed by on a horse-drawn carriage on the way to the Capitol. Kennedys father had been assassinated three days earlier in Dallas, Texas. Bettmann Archive / Getty Images The presidents widow moved the family to the Upper East Side of New York, where JFK Jr. attended a Catholic elementary school. He later attended Collegiate School for Boys in New York and Phillips Academy in Andover, Massachusetts. Meanwhile, much of the American public waited for the young Kennedy to join the political world that had already been shaped by his family. Careers in Law and Journalism JFK Jr. graduated Brown University in 1983 with a degree in American history. He then attended law school at New York University, graduating in 1989. Many considered his law degree a precursor to a political career, but JFK Jr. instead went to work in the Manhattan district attorneys office for four years. In 1995, Kennedy launched a magazine, George, which blended celebrity and public affairs. The magazine was meant to be a mass-market political journal, or, as one of its editors explained, a political magazine for Americans turned off by political magazines. Kennedy wrote and served as editor-in-chief for George. Its publication ended in 2001, after Kennedys death. Marriage to Carolyn Bessette In 1996, JFK Jr. arranged a secretive wedding to Carolyn Bessette, a fashion publicist. The couple went to extraordinary lengths to conceal their nuptials from the public. The wedding was held on an island 20 miles off the coast of Georgia; they chose that particular island in part because it had no access by road or telephone, and almost no lodging. The public learned of their marriage a week after it happened. The couple had no children. Death On July 16, 1999, Kennedy was piloting a small single-engine airplane headed towards Marthas Vineyard, with his wife and her sister onboard. The plane crashed into the Atlantic Ocean. The bodies of the three crash victims were found off the coast of Marthas Vineyard five days later, on July 21. One year later, in 2000, the National Transportation Safety Board ruled the crash an accident caused by Kennedys failure to maintain control of the airplane during a descent over water at night, which was a result of spatial disorientation. The government agency said haze and darkness were factors in the crash. Legacy Kennedy was raised to abide by a scriptural passage found in Luke 12:48: Of those to whom much is given, much is required. It was in that spirit that, in 1989, he founded a nonprofit called Reaching Up, which helps low-wage health and human-services professionals attain higher education, training, and career advancement. Reaching Up continues to help students pay for tuition, books, transportation, child care, and other education costs. Sources Blow, Richard. American Son: A Portrait of John F. Kennedy, Jr. Henry Holt Co., 2002.Grunwald, Michael. â€Å"JFK Jr. Feared Dead in Plane Crash.†Ã‚  The Washington Post, WP Company, 18 July 1999, www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/national/longterm/jfkjr/stories/kennedy071899.htm.Seelye, Katharine Q. â€Å"John F. Kennedy Jr., Heir To a Formidable Dynasty.†Ã‚  The New York Times, The New York Times, 19 July 1999, www.nytimes.com/1999/07/19/us/john-f-kennedy-jr-heir-to-a-formidable-dynasty.html.

Athesim Is The New Fundamentalism Religion Essays

Athesim Is The New Fundamentalism Religion Essays Athesim Is The New Fundamentalism Religion Essay Athesim Is The New Fundamentalism Religion Essay Merely what is all the dither about? Well, I suppose that depends on who you talk to. Some people say the existent inquiry is whether god exists or non. Other folks will state that it is an statement about fundamentalism ( with its built-in dangers ) and that both sides accuse each other of being merely that. Even more province that it is about holding creationism and the ( alleged ) thought of intelligent design being allowed back into the schoolroom. For me, I have already stated my ain personal beliefs. This is NOT a complicated issue for me. No God exists and the universe can make merely ticket WITHOUT my believing that one DOES be. The Earth will go on to revolve on it s ain axis ; will go on to revolve in an oval around the Sun each twelvemonth. We will go on to love household and friends, flowers will blossom in the spring and the future consequences of planetary warming-good OR bad- will go on without my belief in a super-natural being. For the benefit of those that have non seen the arguments, nor had an disposition to read tonss of books on the topic, possibly I can cast some visible radiation on at least some of the more major subjects being debated between theists and atheists today. Another chapter or 2 will be devoted to existent claims by theists and the sensible rebuttals of those places. One recent argument was about whether athesim is the new fundamentalism . A cardinal statement from the theistic side was that atheists normally did non understand the committedness one makes sing being close to god, etc.. It was felt that atheists by and large dismiss that every bit merely another one of faiths idiosyncrasies. Again the unbelieving point of view trades with the statement straight and merely provinces that the great bulk of non-religious people USED TO BE, and have become, non-religious because they ve given up the committedness that they were led into as kids, taught in school, taught by their community, church, mosque, temple, etc.. Sometimes, even, they have given it up with changing grades of uncomfortableness and hurting, but they understand really good what is involved and what the narrative is that their oppositions, in the treatment, are committed to . We all know that virtually every faith in the universe has their holy book , or original manuscript of the compacts, regulations, narratives, and fables that combine to organize the footing FOR that faith. In Judaism you have the TORAH and Hinduism has the BHAVAGA GITA. Islam has the QURAN, the Bahai religion has the KITAB-i-IQAN and Christianity has the NEW TESTAMENT. Atheists have been accused of holding a philosophy, some common base to which all anti-theists subscribe. There is no holy book of godlessness and neer COULD be , states Professor Richard Dawkins in a recent argument. Atheism is non a belief system , there is merely publically-verified grounds . This goes against the very definition of fundamentalisms rigorous attachment to a holy book, and instead provinces that godlessness contains a committedness to alter, every bit shortly as new grounds comes in . Along with the accusals of godlessness being fundamentalist , there is besides the misconception that we know all there is to cognize, that we know the truth . In fact, any intelligent atheist runs pretty-much along the same lines as the idea processes of scientists. That is to state that we glorification in what we yet DO NT cognize . We are non bored with the yesteryear ( as theists would impeach us, associating to our comparative neutrality in the history of the bible, for case ) but instead we are excited by what it leads on toaˆÂ ¦ . What we DO NT knowaˆÂ ¦.. It can be, once more, compared to the scientific sphere where the spreads in our cognition ( the dodo record, as we have already talked about, for illustration ) are the beginning of derision from the theistic side. They maintain that, because of big spreads in our grounds or cognition, that no more inquiries have to be askedaˆÂ ¦ the reply is that god did it . On the contrary, scientists and atheists li kewise take pride in the fact that they are ready to roll up their arms and acquire down to working out things , trying to FILL IN those spreads. Any effort to de-rail unbelieving, rational, critical idea by claiming a holy book written by antediluvian, desert nomads is the reply, is foolish so. Dawkins concludes, Science may non cognize what happened before the Big Bang , scientific discipline may non cognize yet how life began, but if SCIENCE does nt cognize the replies to those inquiries, so there s perfectly no ground to say the reply is to be found in an ancient sanctum book, or ANY spiritual textaˆÂ ¦.. To believe THAT would be True FUNDAMENTALISM aˆÂ ¦aˆÂ ¦ Another muddying-the-water theist technique is to seek to hold long, intellectually-formed articles, trying to depict what an atheist truly stands for. What type of atheist ARE you , one might state. Materialism, pantheism, agnosticism, negative theoretic godlessness, practical godlessness. These are some of the categories of godlessness defined. They tell of philosophical differences, and changing degrees of committedness towards anti-theism. Suffice-it-to-say that each of these have their footing in history, but you will happen that most modern-day atheists are of the normal type, merely basking life without the demand to believe in an omniscient super-natural creatoraˆÂ ¦ . terminal of narrative. A 2nd point to see sing accusals of being fundamentalist, are the charges that we are extremists , that we are similar to the people involved in abortion-clinic bombardments or the ill-famed events of Sept. 11th, 2001. These, possibly, are accusals of the highly despairing or ill-informed, nevertheless I feel the demand to compose on this a spot. There have been many atrocious things in our history done in the name of faith, but when have you of all time heard of something atrocious being done in the name of Atheism? It is easy to take out and depict atrocious things like the extinction of 1000s of intellectuals and more by the despotic leader POL POT, for illustration, and state he did these atrocious things BECAUSE he was an atheist. In his early beginnings, because of hapless classs in school, he was considered to be a premier campaigner for inclusion into the philistine PCF group but that was 20 old ages before he came to power. I suppose that being an anti-intellectual organisation histories for their targeting of atheists, as a big per centum of true atheists do so hold ( or possess in some manner ) an rational mentality. POL POT evidently did non. Furthermore, POL POT was into many things, and if you take a sound expression into his life, he was more about killing people indiscriminately and doing problem in the name of groups within his state instead than killing people BECAUSE he was an atheist. If he WAS an atheist, he was surely NOT killing people based on that minor personal belief. He was nuts, pure-and-simple! ! ! The same can be said of STALIN, another individual frequently lumped in with the few tyrants the universe has had to postulate with who happened to be atheists ( in changing grades, I might add ) , but did NOT perpetrate their offenses BECAUSE they were atheists. He was an evil adult male who had a place of power and was a marionette of LENIN. He was a totalitarian dictator and if he had killed spiritual people, it would be because they would certainly be against the province and thereby him every bit good. Further research into Stalins life reveals that possibly he was non so anti-theist as people think. In the documental Mysteries of the Century: Kremlin Kids ( having Stalins girl, Svetlana Alliluyeva Stalin ) she recalled the followingaˆÂ ¦ . In male parent s library, between other books, were few tomes of Christ . It was history of Christ written by vox democrat Morozov. I said to my male parent: But Christ did nt be! and he answered Oh no, Christ, certainly exist ed. She goes on to speak about a few Acts of the Apostless that would look to propose Stalin was instead soft on covering with the religious-mindedaˆÂ ¦ . Under Stalins insistingaˆÂ ¦ . The Politburo of the Central Committee has admitted prosecutions of trusters inexpedient . Stalin besides canceled Lenin s direction from May, 1st, 1919 for N 13666-2 About battle against priests and faith and gave orders to People s Commissariat of Internal Affairs ( NKVD ) to let go of from detention already arrested priests if activity of these citizens did nt harm the Soviet authorization . The 9/11 calamity was committed by 19 highjackers who did all in the name of faith . They candidly and unfeignedly believed they were acting in a good and righteous manner , explains Richard Dawkins. They believed they were making what their God wanted them to make, they believed they were traveling to a martyrs wages . There is a logical patterned advance towards extreme spiritual indoctrination and these types of tragic events. Atheists beliefs have no such sort of logical, awful effects. These Muslim extremist folks have been taught these sorts of things since childhood in their religion schools. If there WERE a school of religion for godlessness there most surely would Not be any instructions which would demand a violent onslaught on people. If there WERE such schools they would be taught critical-thinking and how to do up their ain heads . Another accusal placed upon atheists ( more so on the more vocal 1s like the people I refer to in this book ) is the manner in which they use words to explicate their instance. Theists will state that they are utilizing the linguistic communication of extremism in seeking to acquire their facts across. In fact, this alleged new godlessness is the current phrase being bandied about on the argument circuit. Some of the more vocal of the unbelieving supporters, Richard Dawkins and Christopher Hitchens, as illustrations, are accused by assorted and assorted as being militant , dogmatic , radical , or extremist in their positions. The amusing thing about all this ( if you can name it funny ) is the immense spread in the existent extremism practiced, when comparing other societal motions like ISLAM, CHRISTIANITY and the BLACK PANTHERS. From saintgasoline.com you get What is being branded as extremism, combativeness, and fundamentalism in the New Atheist motion is barely correspondent to the extremism found in most other societal motions. In Islam, for case, the extremists talk of destroying heathens and western society, strap bombs to themselves, and wing planes into edifices. In Christianity, extremists and fundamentalists vilify homophiles and the generative picks of adult females, frequently trying to restrict their rights through statute law. In the civil rights motion, groups like the Black Panthers advocated and even practiced force. Meanwhile, in the New Atheist motion at worst you might happen Hitchens doing a self-satisfied comment, and that is what constitutes atheist fundamentalism and ext remism to so many critics of this motion. Passion for the attempt and work, plus the energy and enthusiasm observed with these two atheists is frequently mistaken for an utmost point of view, but is misguided as you can see. Another argument subject is the idea, by some theists, that atheists are truly agnostics-in-disguise. They go on to impeach atheists of being close-minded in their beliefs and that agnosticism is a more acceptable point of view. It is, nevertheless, false to accept the position that being agnostic is the middle-ground between theism and godlessness. Agnostics merely province that they can non claim to cognize for certain if any Gods exist or non. Atheists merely have an absence of belief in any God. In this manner, agnosticism is wholly compatible with both theism and godlessness. A individual can believe in a God ( theism ) without claiming to cognize for certain if that God exists ; the consequence is agnostic theism. On the other manus, a individual can discredit in Gods ( godlessness ) without claiming to cognize for certain that no Gods can or make exist ; the consequence is agnostic godlessness. The fact is that it is wholly possible for a individual to be agnostic AND atheist at the same clip. The averment by theists that atheists are more close-minded than doubters barely is a point in their favour. If atheists are close-minded for their rejection of Gods so, by really definition, so are the theists for their positions on the existent being of Gods! ! Far be it for atheists to really Be close-minded to the being of God though. It is apparent that some theists WANT their unbelieving oppositions to acknowledge that they are agnostic, as they can so impeach them of non being perfectly certain that God exists and of holding a faith place and hence have the upper manus in arguments, as that averment would do the theists feel more comfy. There are truly two definitions of godlessness that are considered in this subject. The THEIST version of an atheist is one who is certain there is no God, whereas the Agnostic is non certain. The ATHEIST version is one who BELIEVES there is no God, whereas an Agnostic merely does non cognize. I realize the two sound similar, but the ground most atheists say they do nt Believe in a God indicates something less than an absolute certainty of a Gods non-existance. In my sentiment, any moderately intelligent atheist would acknowledge that he/she would let 2 or 3 per centum points in favour of the possibil ty that there may be a God. It is non a sitting-on-the-fence scenario, instead it is an intelligent, reasoned position based on their apprehension of the work scientific discipline contributes to the universe. It is the truth brought about by the balance of grounds ( instead than a faith-based place ) that motivates atheists. They are cognizant that some piece of grounds might demo itself in the hereafter, and they respect that possibility ( againaˆÂ ¦ evidenceaˆÂ ¦ ) At any rate, theists are ever seeking to happen that angle to do the unbelieving side more vulnerable, but nil seems to be making the fast one so faraˆÂ ¦ . One of the chief implicit in subjects of argument certainly would hold to include the manner both scientific discipline and faith view the universe. In a spiritual world-view it s the supernatural construct of being that is the starting-point for peoples ethical motives and mentality on life, whereas that is non present in a non-religioius world-view. That is the basic premiss, nevertheless theologists are frequently excessively speedy to indicate out, harmonizing to www.teachingaboutreligion.org ( in the opportunism of their debating place ) that a worldview is acquired on an on-going footing, and many an person s worldview model blends spiritual impressions and patterns he or she acquires from a battalion of experiences over clip. A individual with exposure to several spiritual traditions is likely to hold a life mentality that is cobbled from the varied experiences and apprehensions to which they have been exposed. Although that statement might be true plenty, it does non take into history the absolute bulk of people who lazily go by the one-and-only faith in which they have been brought up. To propose that most have such an nonsubjective position of their ain faith is to propose that most use REASON to their spiritual beliefs and that does non look to be justifiable. The quotation mark says a individual with exposure to several spiritual traditions aˆÂ ¦aˆÂ ¦ . Where ARE these people? Surely non in the bible-belt of the United States. Surely non in North Korea. Freedom of faith does non be in Saudi Arabia, and a batch of other Muslim provinces. Harmonizing to www.pewforum.org, mentioning to the Pentecostal arm of Christianity..aˆÂ ¦ at least a one-fourth of the universe s 2 billion Christians are thought to be members of these lively, extremely personal religions, which emphasize such spiritually regenerating gifts of the Holy Spirit as speech production in linguas, Godhead healing and prophesying. Even more than other Christians, Pentecostals and other renewalists believe that God, moving through the Holy Spirit, continues to play a direct, active function in mundane life. I think this quotation mark goes a long manner to explicating the real-life position of the truster in our contemporary society. Add the fact that ( from www.religioustolerance.org ) over 33 % of the universe is Christian, Muslims history for about 20 % , Hindus 13 % and 21 % of the universes population patterns all the other signifiers of faith, and one gets a pretty clear image of the sheer Numberss. I would Love to cognize what per centum of these people are free-thinkers when it comes to embracing other peoples world-views ? Some of the arguments and treatments are nonreversible. These theists are at that place non to larn anything, but are at that place to make the sermon they know all excessively good. Arguments are a bipartisan street and one should ever hold a small spot of an unfastened head when come ining into such a argument. Preparation should be compulsory, but so should a willingness to larn niceties of the other sides place that, perchance, you were before of unaware. At a recent argument at a local auditorium, I had the good luck of being able to present a inquiry ( spoken as a remark because I did non desire to come across TOO harsh ) to the theists on the phase. I merely asked whether their statements on their existent belief in the being of God were echt, or did they merely reflect the fact that they had much to derive from holding dedicated a life to faith and spiritual surveies and holding written books and profited greatly by their publication etc.. I besides stated that would look a normal and baronial thing, to support oneself against an onslaught of unfavorable judgment over positions tightly held, but that all statements made SHOULD be done with a nod to common-sense and ground, things NOT apparently high on the docket of the theistic side. In fact, a sound self-look into 1s ain spiritual beliefs may problem many a truster, so of course we do nt anticipate their statements to incorporate much critical-thinking. I neer truly did acquire a satisfactory response to my inquiry that afternoon.

Emma & Sam Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

Emma & Sam - Essay Example While making an order, in respect of spousal support, the judge will take into consideration, various factors, such as; first, the duration for which the couple had been married. Emma and Sam had been married for 8 years. Fifth, the obligations and assets of each party. Emma and Sam have three minor children. Two of these are with Sam, and one of them is with Emma. These are their obligations. Their assets, are real estate holdings in California and Nevada; and Emma is the beneficiary of a $10 million dollar trust. Sixth, the history of the manner, in which they had addressed their financial needs, during their marriage. All expenses were borne by Emma, as she was earning a substantial amount. Sam as an unemployed musician had chosen to look after their children (Self - Help Center, 2010). In instances of dissolution of a marriage, the following are taken into consideration by the courts. First, the date of separation, which is determined by the actions of the husband and wife, or their intention (Cutoff Date as the Date of Separation, 2010). In our case, Sam proceeded to their Nevada family vacation house, six weeks ago, and informed Emma that he would initiate divorce proceedings against her. Second, the community property, which in our case would consist of all the assets created from Emma’s earnings, subsequent to their marriage and prior to their separation. While dividing the properties, and confirming the liabilities of the parties, the court shall classify the liabilities as separate or community; and assign them appropriately (Family Code). Sam informed Emma that he had obtained a Nevada residency certificate, and that he intended to file divorce proceedings in Nevada.

Professional Ethics Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words

Professional Ethics - Essay Example It outlines the implications of such behavior and also discusses professional etiquette. Implications of Conflicts of Interest Conflict of interest in the tender management industry is illegal and may lead to prosecution of individuals or companies that intentionally benefit from the conflict. It leads to award of tenders with total disregard of merit and hence some qualified companies may not have a chance to undertake the work that they are competent in. In most cases, tenders awarded on the basis of conflicts of interest eventually fail or the expected outcome is not realized. According to Worthington & Goldsman (1998), the success of a project depends on the sincerity of the involved parties to satisfy the needs of stakeholders. Conflicts of interests lead to the pursuance of individual benefits while ignoring public interest. The preferred bidder in such a process may quote low prices and eventually end up requesting for additional funding with excuses of high cost of materials or high inflation thereby increasing the cost of a project. Such bidders are to blame for many projects that have turned in to white elephants, yet there might have been genuine bidders who would have accomplished the work at a lower cost (Keyes, 2004). In an economy, companies that do not win contracts as a result of conflicts of interest may become bankrupt in the long-run (O’Connor, 2007). On the other hand, those that are awarded tenders due to their political influence end up having no competitor and therefore they relax in terms of quality standards. A significant loss is experienced in the economy with regards to the desired impacts of the project, while on the other hand such practices promote corruption. Oyer (2005) observes that conflicts of interest in the management of tenders in the Philippines have led to an economic decline that has seen the country being overtaken by Thailand despite of having been ahead of it in the last five decades. In the economies where c onflicts of interest are pronounced, transparency and accountability are concealed from public scrutiny. To avoid the undesirable consequences of conflicts of interest, those involved in tender management should be thoroughly researched to establish if they are personal interests that may hamper the tendering process. Any relationship between the client and bidders needs to be investigated to thwart conflict (Gallagher, 2005). If a person in the tendering process is found to promote conflicts of interest, he/she should be disqualified from participating. In some instances when disqualification of a person is impossible, a conflict of interest can be managed through involving a third party to control the conflict. However, setting up of a code of ethics in tender management is the most significant tool to guide the tendering process. This is because if the code of ethics is adhered to, it can promote professional etiquette thereby preventing extra-professional affairs that may cause conflicts of interest (Ferrell & Fraedrich, 2009). Professional Etiquette Professional etiquette is a scheme of rules and principles that standardize social and professional conduct. In any organization, there are certain set of rules and behaviors that are recognized to have a positive influence on an organization’s strategic objectives. Each position in a bureaucratic organization is guided by principles that are endorsed by

Growth and Potential of International Luxury Fashion Brands Essay Example for Free

Growth and Potential of International Luxury Fashion Brands Essay